So, not to long ago I made a blog post about my Independent reading book, The Kite Runner and recently I just finished it. While I thought this was an amazing book (especially since it was a change from that other book), this story is nothing to me but a tragedy. Even the ending doesn't make up for the terrible, awful, and tragic events that happen in this story.
I won't give away everything that happens in the book for those who want to read it, but I do have to address the really sad and depressing things that happened so Spoiler Alert.
Out from the start this book seems innocent enough with the main character Amir talking about his life with his dad and his servant/best friend Hassan. However, all of that changes when after a Kite fighting competition when Hassan leaves to get the final kite for Amir and he runs into some bullies who picked on both of them, but mainly for Hassan because he is a Hazara. They demand the kite and he refuses, so they go on to beat him up. If this isn't sad enough, it gets worse. Amir was there watching the events unfold. He followed Hassan and had a chance to try and save him, but refused and let him get beat up. Even worse is that afterword, the main bully Assef (who if you know who he is you will hate for all of his days) goes on to rape Hassan right there in the alley with Amir around the corner listening to this. So yeah, that is a really sad note righ5t there and it really sets the tone of the book.
Another depressing thing happened when Amir and his father are trying to leave Afghanistan during the Soviet Invasion and are forced to go through the smuggling operation. They are forced into cramped spaces with people and even witness one boy suffocate while in a gas truck and then his father commit suicide. Again, real sad and depressing.
Probably the worst thing happens when (Major Spoilers) Amir goes back to Afghanistan to find Hassan's son and his half nephew. He finds him under the "care" of Assef, who has joined the Taliban and has been sexually abused by him and the guards. Amir then has to fight Assef to get Sohrab's (the boy) freedom. He is beaten almost to a pulp and almost dies until Sohrab shoots a gold ball into Assef's eye.
Now, where in this whole story do you see a happy ending? Yes there are some happy parts for the characters but its really overshadowed when dealing with all this drama. Even the ending when Sohrab begins to open up to Amir doesn't make the book happy in the end. At least in my opinion. It's still very tragic and is in my opinion a tragedy. Also, some of you might think that I gave a negative review of this book and that is wrong. I think this book was amazing with great writing and good characters. Even though its story is sad and tragic, I still highly recommend it.
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Into The Kite Runner (IR)
So, for my next independent reading book, I have decided to read the critically acclaimed novel, The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini and here are my thoughts so far.
Going into this book, I had no idea what to expect. I had heard the title before and seen the book, but I was completely lost on what it would be about. After reading the summary, I associated it with What is the What mainly because it was about a boy who has a happy life before the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan which for one reason or another reminded me of the Sudanese Civil War and Valentino's journey. However, 100 pages into it, my perspective was completely changed. This book tells the story about Amir who lives in Afghanistan right before the Russian Invasion. However, there are other events that happen before this time and it shows his hardships growing up. I can't give too much away as it is a really good book and I don't want to spoil anything for people who want to read it. What I can say that while it is very good, it is also extremely sad and depressing and after a while you stop caring for the main character. However, it isn't all depressing as there are moments for Amir to shine and some very happy moments. The great thing about this book is that is able to balance them out in a very unique way. I also like this book as it actually tells a story and makes sense unlike my previous independent reading book which was a complete and udder waste of time.
That's all I can really say without spoiling the plot which is something that I won't do. All I can say is that if you read this book, you won't be disappointed. It is emotional, but satisfying in the end.
Going into this book, I had no idea what to expect. I had heard the title before and seen the book, but I was completely lost on what it would be about. After reading the summary, I associated it with What is the What mainly because it was about a boy who has a happy life before the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan which for one reason or another reminded me of the Sudanese Civil War and Valentino's journey. However, 100 pages into it, my perspective was completely changed. This book tells the story about Amir who lives in Afghanistan right before the Russian Invasion. However, there are other events that happen before this time and it shows his hardships growing up. I can't give too much away as it is a really good book and I don't want to spoil anything for people who want to read it. What I can say that while it is very good, it is also extremely sad and depressing and after a while you stop caring for the main character. However, it isn't all depressing as there are moments for Amir to shine and some very happy moments. The great thing about this book is that is able to balance them out in a very unique way. I also like this book as it actually tells a story and makes sense unlike my previous independent reading book which was a complete and udder waste of time.
That's all I can really say without spoiling the plot which is something that I won't do. All I can say is that if you read this book, you won't be disappointed. It is emotional, but satisfying in the end.
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Second to None (CC)
So, as we move into our comedy unit (a unit I anticipate will be my favorite) I decided to do my blog post relating to comedy and the terms we learned over the weekend. The first two terms that I saw that intrigued me were low comedy and high comedy. Low comedy is basic comedy that doesn't require a lot of thinking basically stuff like physical comedy or crude humor. High comedy is something that is witty and requires some thinking in order to understand the humor behind it. Something in this area would be like a stand up routine or satire shows like The Daily Show or The Colbert Report. However, I have personally found something that is able to blend both low and high comedy in a very entertaining way. This is the brilliance that is the Chicago Comedy troupe The Second City.
For those of you unfamiliar with the group, they are basically a improve group in Chicago that puts on very funny shows. There are a couple of different versions of the group, but it got its start in Chicago back in the 60s. Second City is also known as a starting point for comedians and actors, as some people in the troupe eventually go on to bigger things, like (often) becoming a cast member on Saturday Night Live. There is also a very impressive list of Alumni including stars like Alan Alda, Harold Ramis, John Belushi, Tina Fey, Keegan-Michael Key, etc.
Here's a link to the list if you want to learn more: Link
Going back to the post, I have seen two shows of Second City when I was in Chicago and they are brilliant. Like I mentioned earlier they are able to transition between both high and low comedy in a very impressive way. One moment they will be doing some slapstick and the next thing you know, they're talking about a political person or making references to homosexuality. I remember during one of their shows there was an ongoing thing with someone giving CPR to someone in a very forceful fashion (if it sounds weird, that's the point) which is low humor, seeing someone in pain. It then transitioned to two gays having dinner trying to get to know one another on a date and the things they try to relate to is high comedy, requiring some good thinking on the audience's end. What's also really impressive is that almost the entire routine is improve. There might a scripted scene or two, but for the majority, it's improve so the fact that they can do this is really something to see.
I really can't say much about Second City as you need to see it in order to understand why it is funny. The first act will seem really random as it will be nothing but random skits one after another but that's the point. Really, just go and see it. I guarantee that you won't be disappointed as they bombard you with their high and low comedy and improve.
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Forbidden Poetry? (CC)
So far I have been split on whether or not I enjoy our poetry unit. On one hand, the imagery in poems are amazing and I especially love the text breaks that occur. I can't explain it, but when the text breaks so suddenly and drastically, it just really gets to me. On the counter point though, I really am not that into poetry. I can't always figure out why the author chose to break the text there or what kind of figure of speech they used. However, when looking through poems to do for my poetry project, I came across a rather enjoyable and unique poem; "If You Forget Me" by Pablo Neruda.
Link:http://www.poemhunter.com/best-poems/pablo-neruda/if-you-forget-me/
Unfortunately, I was denied this poem on the grounds that it may have been translated and so some words may have had different meanings. The good news is that this poem wasn't my first choice, but instead my second choice. Even though I ended up getting my first choice, I was still a little annoyed at the fact that I wouldn't have been able to do this poem even if I wanted to. Well, I decided to do a little analysis on this poem because 1. It's a great poem that deserves to be analyzed and 2. because I really want to do it because it was denied. I'm basically following the whole "tell someone not to do something and all they want to do is that" cliche, but I don't care.
So the summary is very simple and for the lazy people out there, I'll give you the highlights. A guy is proclaiming to a girl that he is in love with her and wants to be with her, but he also gives her a warning. If she begins to become disinterested, he will begin to become disinterested in her and then leave her if she forgets him. He also says that if she will love him, he will treat her greatly and love her for the rest of his days.
What I found intriguing about this poem is the way it goes from a love poem to a threat seamlessly. It starts by saying that he deeply cares for this girl, but also retaliates saying he will leave her if she forgets him, begging the question of whether he truly cares for her. Is it actual love or is he trying to scare her so that he can control the relationship? Something about the whole idea just really gets to me and its what prompted me to consider it for the project. Oh well.
Link:http://www.poemhunter.com/best-poems/pablo-neruda/if-you-forget-me/
Unfortunately, I was denied this poem on the grounds that it may have been translated and so some words may have had different meanings. The good news is that this poem wasn't my first choice, but instead my second choice. Even though I ended up getting my first choice, I was still a little annoyed at the fact that I wouldn't have been able to do this poem even if I wanted to. Well, I decided to do a little analysis on this poem because 1. It's a great poem that deserves to be analyzed and 2. because I really want to do it because it was denied. I'm basically following the whole "tell someone not to do something and all they want to do is that" cliche, but I don't care.
So the summary is very simple and for the lazy people out there, I'll give you the highlights. A guy is proclaiming to a girl that he is in love with her and wants to be with her, but he also gives her a warning. If she begins to become disinterested, he will begin to become disinterested in her and then leave her if she forgets him. He also says that if she will love him, he will treat her greatly and love her for the rest of his days.
What I found intriguing about this poem is the way it goes from a love poem to a threat seamlessly. It starts by saying that he deeply cares for this girl, but also retaliates saying he will leave her if she forgets him, begging the question of whether he truly cares for her. Is it actual love or is he trying to scare her so that he can control the relationship? Something about the whole idea just really gets to me and its what prompted me to consider it for the project. Oh well.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Thoughts on The Sound and the Fury (IR)
(Warning, the following may contain spoilers for The Sound in the Fury. Read at your own discretion)
So, I have just recently finished reading my independent novel The Sound in the Fury and I have to say I am glad I'm done with it. Mainly because it was a little big and its now one less thing to worry about. Now, here are my thoughts on the novel.
If you choose to read this book, be warned that it is very hard to follow at times. The book is broken up into four sections and the first section has no concept of time, making it hard to figure out what's happening. You'll be reading one part then it will flash do another with no indication a switch has been made. The other sections are easier to read, but still have a hard time making a distinction memories and the actual events. It also didn't help that the dialogue is written in a southern accent which makes sense as it takes place in the deep south during the 1930s, but it can be hard to read, either from not knowing what's being said or not enjoying seeing an apostrophe over every word.
I will say though that when you finally do figure out what's happening, it is a very interesting and engaging read. It tells the story of the Compson Family and the narration is done through three of its members. It also helped to create the "stream of consciousness" narrative where you read about a person's thoughts and reactions to events. The fact that this was the novel that created it does give it some credibility.
As for the characters, some are enjoyable, others are awful and you should hate them for it. I didn't really connect a lot with them mainly because 1. I didn't share any of their views (except Quentin) and 2. I had no idea who anyone was when I first read it.
In conclusion, did I like this book? No, it made little sense when I read it. I only finally understood it when I read the Spark notes for it and by then it had little impact on me. Would I recommend it to you "literary scholars?" Probably. Even though I didn't like it and don't see how anyone could, I do see why. It presents a very interesting story with dynamic characters. The fact that it also created a new type of narration is also great so I do recommend it. I will say this though, if you read it, read it carefully and make sure to have a spark notes book nearby to use if you get lost. It may be a good read, but it is very dense and confusing at times.
So, I have just recently finished reading my independent novel The Sound in the Fury and I have to say I am glad I'm done with it. Mainly because it was a little big and its now one less thing to worry about. Now, here are my thoughts on the novel.
If you choose to read this book, be warned that it is very hard to follow at times. The book is broken up into four sections and the first section has no concept of time, making it hard to figure out what's happening. You'll be reading one part then it will flash do another with no indication a switch has been made. The other sections are easier to read, but still have a hard time making a distinction memories and the actual events. It also didn't help that the dialogue is written in a southern accent which makes sense as it takes place in the deep south during the 1930s, but it can be hard to read, either from not knowing what's being said or not enjoying seeing an apostrophe over every word.
I will say though that when you finally do figure out what's happening, it is a very interesting and engaging read. It tells the story of the Compson Family and the narration is done through three of its members. It also helped to create the "stream of consciousness" narrative where you read about a person's thoughts and reactions to events. The fact that this was the novel that created it does give it some credibility.
As for the characters, some are enjoyable, others are awful and you should hate them for it. I didn't really connect a lot with them mainly because 1. I didn't share any of their views (except Quentin) and 2. I had no idea who anyone was when I first read it.
In conclusion, did I like this book? No, it made little sense when I read it. I only finally understood it when I read the Spark notes for it and by then it had little impact on me. Would I recommend it to you "literary scholars?" Probably. Even though I didn't like it and don't see how anyone could, I do see why. It presents a very interesting story with dynamic characters. The fact that it also created a new type of narration is also great so I do recommend it. I will say this though, if you read it, read it carefully and make sure to have a spark notes book nearby to use if you get lost. It may be a good read, but it is very dense and confusing at times.
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
More Apple Stuff (IR)
So today (if Ian didn't already tell you) was the unveiling of the IPhone 6 and the IPhone 6 plus, making everyone's other Apple stuff seem obsolete. However, during the event, Apple also announced a new product as well to add to its extensive collection, the Apple Watch.
Since I was in school and busy when the announcement aired, I found this article explaining the Watch.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-watch-announced-at-apple-2014-event/
Many people think of it as an IPhone on your wrist, but according to Tim Cook, "It is much more than that." It retains many of the basic features of an IPhone (IE Apps, touch screen, etc.) Some new features on this include the new GPS which uses something they call "Taptic Touch" which causes the watch to nudge in the direction you should go, which sounds pretty interesting to me. There is also a health and fitness app on it which can monitor your vitals, which can be very helpful to people.
I myself am not much of an Apple nut, but I have to admit that this watch sounds pretty amazing. I don't know if it will join Apple in its lineup as smartwatches are pretty rare now. However, taking into consideration everything this watch can do, I really hope that it becomes a hit and that I will be able to buy it in the future (once the price goes down, its set at $350).
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-watch-announced-at-apple-2014-event/
Many people think of it as an IPhone on your wrist, but according to Tim Cook, "It is much more than that." It retains many of the basic features of an IPhone (IE Apps, touch screen, etc.) Some new features on this include the new GPS which uses something they call "Taptic Touch" which causes the watch to nudge in the direction you should go, which sounds pretty interesting to me. There is also a health and fitness app on it which can monitor your vitals, which can be very helpful to people.
I myself am not much of an Apple nut, but I have to admit that this watch sounds pretty amazing. I don't know if it will join Apple in its lineup as smartwatches are pretty rare now. However, taking into consideration everything this watch can do, I really hope that it becomes a hit and that I will be able to buy it in the future (once the price goes down, its set at $350).
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
Mr. Pirzada and Pi Patel (CC)
So, during our Labor Day break, I decided to get a jump start on my AP Lit homework. I started with one of the stories in Interpreter of Maladies titled "Mr. Pirzada Comes to Dine." The story was basically about this man, Mr. Pirzada, who comes to eat and stay at the protagonists house while he is in the U.S. The story itself is pretty interesting and sad, and it was during one of these sad parts that I made a connection to Pi from the novel Life of Pi.
If you don't know the story, it is about a boy named Pi who is forced to survive stranded at sea in a boat with a tiger. It is a very entertaining book and I recommend reading it. Anyway, back to the point, the novel explains some background on Pi and reveals that he follows three religions; Hinduism, Christianity, and Islam. When he wanted to convert to Islam, his father was against this, stating that Islams and Hindu's don't get along well. The same thing happened to Mr. Pirzada when it was revealed to the family that he lives in East Pakistan. They then began to regard him in a different because he was a Muslim. It was during this section that I made the connection to Life of Pi.
After this, I wanted to learn more about the issue between the Hindus and Muslims. While many people argue about the motives, there is major evidence that these major riots began back in 1947 following the partition from Pakistan. This has led to many incidents, the most famous being the Nellie Massacre where around 5000 lives were taken and almost all of them were Muslim. It's really sad to see how these people who used to be from the same country can suddenly turn on each other and kill. Interpreter of Maladies has really helped me open my eyes to a lot of issues in the world surrounding India and is overall a really good, albeit sad, novel.
After this, I wanted to learn more about the issue between the Hindus and Muslims. While many people argue about the motives, there is major evidence that these major riots began back in 1947 following the partition from Pakistan. This has led to many incidents, the most famous being the Nellie Massacre where around 5000 lives were taken and almost all of them were Muslim. It's really sad to see how these people who used to be from the same country can suddenly turn on each other and kill. Interpreter of Maladies has really helped me open my eyes to a lot of issues in the world surrounding India and is overall a really good, albeit sad, novel.
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
66th Emmy Awards Review (FW)
So, last night was the 66th annual Primetime Emmy Awards. For the first time since 1976, it was broadcasted on a Monday mainly due to conflicts with next months Sunday Night Football and MTV's VMA Awards. I usually like award shows mainly because its cool to see amazing television shows honored for bringing us great entertainment. I was especially excited for this year's show mainly because for the first time, I had seen some of the dramas nominated for best drama (yes I know, start making comments about me not watching Breaking Bad until now). I had watched Breaking Bad, House of Cards, and Game of Thrones this "television" year, so I was really excited. There was also the list of comedies that I love, so it was set to be a pretty great night.
The host was Seth Meyers, a pretty respectable and funny actor. I haven't seen any of Late Night yet, but I enjoyed him immensely on SNL so I thought it would be good. The opening was okay, a few jokes here and there and a pretty good Segway into the awards. I loved it when Bryan Cranston and Julia Louis-Dreyfus were presenters and Julia "forgot" that Bryan was on Seinfeld and he was her boyfriend(the dentist). Her memory came back when he kissed her after winning Best Actress in a Comedy. The presenters were also okay, with the humor ranging from great to mild. I also liked it when Gwen Stefani pulled a "Adele Dazeem" by pronouncing the T's in The Colbert Report. I really enjoyed when Seth and Billy Eichner went around asking people about the Emmys and having them awkwardly respond (should probably mention this took place in the street). There was also Weird Al's performance, taking theme songs from shows like Mad Men, Game of Thrones, and so on and adding words to them.
Of course, the most emotional moment of the night was the "In Memoriam" section, highlighting those who have passed on like Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Maya Angelou, and Harold Ramis. A special segment was dedicated solely for Robin Williams which I thought was very touching. "Oh captain, My Captain."
Now lets get to the awards. I was happy to see Ty Burrell and Jim Parsons win for comedy as they are some of my favorite actors. I also loved it when Aaron Paul and Anna Gunn won in their categories. As much as I loved you this season Tyrion, I had to give to Jessie. Some big surprises to me came from the Miniseries or Television Movie Category, with Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman winning for Best Actor and Supporting Actor respectively for their performance on Sherlock. I did think that they did great this year and it was cool to see a show that's three season's in and only 9 episodes be recognized the way they did (the episodes are long, but are very entertaining). Of course the major awards of the night were Best Comedy and Best Drama. Really it was a contest of Modern Family vs. Orange is the New Black and Breaking Bad vs. True Detective. That's just my opinion, but it seemed that these two legends were being challenged by some new hits. Modern Family did win and continues to cement itself as "TV's Funniest Comedy" which I'm okay with. When it came down to Drama, it was kind of anyone's game, but I was rooting for Breaking Bad. I'm not going to lie, the other nominees were impressive. Game of Thrones kicked major ass this year and House of Cards was definitely more darker and intriguing. I have only seen one episode of True Detective, but so far it's pretty good. But nothing could beat the second half of the final season of Breaking Bad. It was just so good that I'm mad I didn't start watching sooner. Breaking Bad also won with Best Actor (Cranston) Supporting Actor (Aaron Paul, Yeah Bitch!) and Supporting Actress (Anna Gunn). While many people may say that it won because it was its final season I say "Yeah, because when Lost was on its final season, it won as well." I'm sorry, but you don't get to be the highest rated television series in history without being excellent.
Overall, I would say that this year's Emmy Awards was awesome. You had some good humor here and there and some great shows won. While I would have preferred to have seen Neil host again, Seth, you did great and the show was awesome.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Now Where Have I Seen Him Before (#7)
So having finished both Beowulf and Grendel, I have come to enjoy both of them immensely. Overall, I think I would agree with Foster with his idea that there is only one story with these particular books as Grendel was more of a prequel rather than a retelling. However, I did find it unique the way John Gardner was able to set up a timeline before Beowulf and was able to incorporate unique settings and characters. I also liked how Grendel learned about the nature of the world from a dragon, which I'm almost certain is the same dragon Beowulf would eventually fight.
I will say though that reading Grendel gave me a whole new perspective on Grendel that I had never thought of before. I still think he is an evil monster who only wants to cause harm on the Danes. There are times where his interactions with certain places and people (i.e. his first encounter with humans, his talk with the dragon) that might have caused him to look upon the world in a harsher light, but he still goes around devouring men and destroying the mead hall for twelve years. While he may have had other influences, it doesn't really redeem his character in my mind. Even with his fight against Beowulf in which it almost makes you see Beowulf as a villain, I wasn't convinced that Grendel was innocent in this situation. All I saw was the a man freeing the Danes from the wrath of Grendel.
I think that out of the two, I appreciate Grendel a little more than Beowulf. Sure Beowulf had a lot of action and is a classic, but it was a little dense at times (being written 1000 years ago will do that) and the summary on the back basically told me everything that would happen. Grendel took on a more psychological stand, showing Grendel learning about the world and basically debating right and wrong. It also showed his innocence, being hypnotized by a minstrel's tale and at times believing that he was a dangerous evil monster. I will say this though, reading Grendel did make me elicit some sympathy for Grendel. It showed how he didn't learn anything about the world because no one would take the time to interact with him. No one would acknowledge him and his mother couldn't speak so it was like he was living in isolation.
Overall, both of the these novels were very interesting. I agree with my sister's statement that Beowulf is basically Chuck Norris. He fights three powerful and dangerous monsters and establishes himself as one of the greatest heroes ever. Grendel was also enjoyable, giving Grendel more of a character rather than just have him be a vicious monster who kills. I also enjoyed how it showed what was happening inside the mind of Grendel and showed how he felt about things. I really enjoyed reading both of these novels and I hope that the novels in AP Lit will be as entertaining as these.
I will say though that reading Grendel gave me a whole new perspective on Grendel that I had never thought of before. I still think he is an evil monster who only wants to cause harm on the Danes. There are times where his interactions with certain places and people (i.e. his first encounter with humans, his talk with the dragon) that might have caused him to look upon the world in a harsher light, but he still goes around devouring men and destroying the mead hall for twelve years. While he may have had other influences, it doesn't really redeem his character in my mind. Even with his fight against Beowulf in which it almost makes you see Beowulf as a villain, I wasn't convinced that Grendel was innocent in this situation. All I saw was the a man freeing the Danes from the wrath of Grendel.
I think that out of the two, I appreciate Grendel a little more than Beowulf. Sure Beowulf had a lot of action and is a classic, but it was a little dense at times (being written 1000 years ago will do that) and the summary on the back basically told me everything that would happen. Grendel took on a more psychological stand, showing Grendel learning about the world and basically debating right and wrong. It also showed his innocence, being hypnotized by a minstrel's tale and at times believing that he was a dangerous evil monster. I will say this though, reading Grendel did make me elicit some sympathy for Grendel. It showed how he didn't learn anything about the world because no one would take the time to interact with him. No one would acknowledge him and his mother couldn't speak so it was like he was living in isolation.
Overall, both of the these novels were very interesting. I agree with my sister's statement that Beowulf is basically Chuck Norris. He fights three powerful and dangerous monsters and establishes himself as one of the greatest heroes ever. Grendel was also enjoyable, giving Grendel more of a character rather than just have him be a vicious monster who kills. I also enjoyed how it showed what was happening inside the mind of Grendel and showed how he felt about things. I really enjoyed reading both of these novels and I hope that the novels in AP Lit will be as entertaining as these.
Sunday, August 10, 2014
Sonnets (#2)
So I have been putting this particular blog post off for a while mainly due to the fact that I don't find sonnets that entertaining. I don't think they're bad or anything, they are just sometimes boring and difficult to decipher at times. I'd much prefer a novel where the plot keeps flowing and keeps me interested. However, I found this sonnet that I thought was very intriguing and it captured my attention immediately. This is Acquainted with the Night by Robert Frost.
I have been one acquainted with the night.
I have walked out in rain—and back in rain.
I have out walked the furthest city light.
I have looked down the saddest city lane.
I have passed by the watchman on his beat
And dropped my eyes, unwilling to explain.
I have stood still and stopped the sound of feet
When far away an interrupted cry
Came over houses from another street,
But not to call me back or say good-by;
And further still at an unearthly height,
One luminary clock against the sky
Proclaimed the time was neither wrong nor right.
I have been one acquainted with the night.
When I first saw this sonnet, the thing that got to be was the structure. Sure it follows the simple ABAB rhyming structure with an occasional twist to finish the section, but I thought it was interesting was that it would break off after the third line rather than the fourth. It's interesting to see an odd number of lines each time and I also found it enjoyable that the rhyme from the second line was continued on into the beginning of the next section. Now the sonnet itself tells a very interesting story. It uses imagery very well to paint the image of a city at night into your mind, almost bringing you into a rainy city. Overall, I gravitated toward the idea of city lights and even the sound of a baby crying as it really cemented you into the city it was describing.
I still don't understand sonnets or a lot of poetry for that matter (and yet I'm taking AP Lit. Quite a predicament) but I truly enjoyed reading this one and I look forward to more poetry that is able to create such vivid images in my mind.
I have been one acquainted with the night.
I have walked out in rain—and back in rain.
I have out walked the furthest city light.
I have looked down the saddest city lane.
I have passed by the watchman on his beat
And dropped my eyes, unwilling to explain.
I have stood still and stopped the sound of feet
When far away an interrupted cry
Came over houses from another street,
But not to call me back or say good-by;
And further still at an unearthly height,
One luminary clock against the sky
Proclaimed the time was neither wrong nor right.
I have been one acquainted with the night.
When I first saw this sonnet, the thing that got to be was the structure. Sure it follows the simple ABAB rhyming structure with an occasional twist to finish the section, but I thought it was interesting was that it would break off after the third line rather than the fourth. It's interesting to see an odd number of lines each time and I also found it enjoyable that the rhyme from the second line was continued on into the beginning of the next section. Now the sonnet itself tells a very interesting story. It uses imagery very well to paint the image of a city at night into your mind, almost bringing you into a rainy city. Overall, I gravitated toward the idea of city lights and even the sound of a baby crying as it really cemented you into the city it was describing.
I still don't understand sonnets or a lot of poetry for that matter (and yet I'm taking AP Lit. Quite a predicament) but I truly enjoyed reading this one and I look forward to more poetry that is able to create such vivid images in my mind.
Friday, August 8, 2014
Geography's Impact on Grendel (#6)
So having just finished the novel Grendel, I have a somewhat new perspective of the great monster from literature. Does it change my view of him altogether? I'll save that for my final post. However, I did notice in this novel that the use of geography was very descriptive and effective, both on the reader and on the characters. Foster's novel talks about the importance of geography and how it can develop characters or contain important symbolism and themes. I think it applies to Grendel's home very well.
Grendel's home is a cave in the middle of a lake. However, said cave is almost impossible to get to. Not that it's under water, more of the lake and his lair is surrounded by a bunch of monsters including fire snakes and water dragons. Not a typical swim to find him as one stubborn hero found out when he tried to kill Grendel for attacking the mead hall. I found the idea of the hole full of fire snakes very interesting for two reasons. One being it's a bunch of fire snakes and that sounds cool but the other that they sort of represent his peace.
In order to come to the surface and raid the people, he has to swim through the pool of fire snakes. As his skin is almost invincible, they don't hurt him and he can swim without fear. However, they represent a change in him. Most of the time when he's in his cave, he is a (somewhat) kind spirit and doesn't do anything like attack his mother. However, swimming through the snakes shows his transformation, becoming the terrifying monster he is. It's like the snakes hold back his (somewhat) good nature when he exits the pool and then gives it back to him when he returns home. The geography acts as a dream catcher in a way, but instead of catching bad dreams, it holds onto his good. Although it's minor, the geography in Grendel helped to make an interesting read.
Grendel's home is a cave in the middle of a lake. However, said cave is almost impossible to get to. Not that it's under water, more of the lake and his lair is surrounded by a bunch of monsters including fire snakes and water dragons. Not a typical swim to find him as one stubborn hero found out when he tried to kill Grendel for attacking the mead hall. I found the idea of the hole full of fire snakes very interesting for two reasons. One being it's a bunch of fire snakes and that sounds cool but the other that they sort of represent his peace.
In order to come to the surface and raid the people, he has to swim through the pool of fire snakes. As his skin is almost invincible, they don't hurt him and he can swim without fear. However, they represent a change in him. Most of the time when he's in his cave, he is a (somewhat) kind spirit and doesn't do anything like attack his mother. However, swimming through the snakes shows his transformation, becoming the terrifying monster he is. It's like the snakes hold back his (somewhat) good nature when he exits the pool and then gives it back to him when he returns home. The geography acts as a dream catcher in a way, but instead of catching bad dreams, it holds onto his good. Although it's minor, the geography in Grendel helped to make an interesting read.
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Quest for Adulthood (#5)
So for my summer assignment I decided to read the great epic Beowulf and it's retelling Grendel which tells the backstory of Grendel and his decent into the monster Beowulf eventually fights and kills. I'm only about 75 pages into it, but so far it's pretty interesting. However, at times it gets really weird, like Grendel describing these things that look at him in his cave, but never acknowledge him. While it's definitely a very bizarre novel, its still entertaining, especially when you see Grendel go though a personal quest.
The second chapter of the book shows when Grendel was young and began to explore outside of his cave and into the real world. He sees moonlight for the first time, gets caught in a tree, feels pain, and has his first experience with man. However, they try to attack and kill him, so not a great first impression. The later chapters are about more contact with humans and him learning about the world, science, religion, philosophy, and so on. However, the second and third chapters are what caught my eye immediately as it puts him through a quest; the loss of his innocence.
In How to Read Literature, Foster says that there are certain points that need to be addressed for a quest: a Quester, place to go, stated reason, challenges, and a real reason to go. This quest almost answers every single point. The quester is Grendel and the place to go is the outside world. Some challenges he faces is getting stuck in a tree, being attacked by a bull and then by men. He never openly states why he takes this quest, but odds are its simple curiosity. The true reason for his quest is to learn and interact with the outside world, the world he has never encountered before. This is also his loss of innocence, as for one of the first times ever, he experiences pain and learns that people fear him. Rather than look at the world as a safe haven, he sees it as what it is; a dangerous place full of violence. This is expanded more in the next two chapters, where he even uses some swear words he learned from men (like a child becoming an adult sometimes tends to do). But during this chapter, his quest for adulthood and loss of innocence makes for a very interesting read.
The second chapter of the book shows when Grendel was young and began to explore outside of his cave and into the real world. He sees moonlight for the first time, gets caught in a tree, feels pain, and has his first experience with man. However, they try to attack and kill him, so not a great first impression. The later chapters are about more contact with humans and him learning about the world, science, religion, philosophy, and so on. However, the second and third chapters are what caught my eye immediately as it puts him through a quest; the loss of his innocence.
In How to Read Literature, Foster says that there are certain points that need to be addressed for a quest: a Quester, place to go, stated reason, challenges, and a real reason to go. This quest almost answers every single point. The quester is Grendel and the place to go is the outside world. Some challenges he faces is getting stuck in a tree, being attacked by a bull and then by men. He never openly states why he takes this quest, but odds are its simple curiosity. The true reason for his quest is to learn and interact with the outside world, the world he has never encountered before. This is also his loss of innocence, as for one of the first times ever, he experiences pain and learns that people fear him. Rather than look at the world as a safe haven, he sees it as what it is; a dangerous place full of violence. This is expanded more in the next two chapters, where he even uses some swear words he learned from men (like a child becoming an adult sometimes tends to do). But during this chapter, his quest for adulthood and loss of innocence makes for a very interesting read.
Sunday, July 20, 2014
Everything is Sex (#4)
Warning: The following blog post contains awkward situations where a simple scene is a metaphor for sex. Read at your own risk. (Seriously, it gets a little awkward).
So, this post about Beowulf will be a little awkward considering which chapter of How to Read Literature Like a Professor I'm applying it to. The chapter is called "Everything is Sex" which basically tells us that almost everything in a novel is a metaphor for sex. Going off topic a little bit, I would like to personally tell Ms. Pyle that I could have gone my whole life not knowing that a little boy riding a rocking horse is a metaphor for masturbation and I would have been okay with that. Sadly, I read this chapter and learned this information. It will now stay with me forever so thanks Ms. Pyle.
Anyway, back to the main focus of the post, I recently read about Beowulf's triumphant victory of the monster Grendel and then Grendel's mother. It was after reading about these that I realized that the battles between Beowulf and the monsters were also a metaphor for sex. When he fights against Grendel, he is locked in an embrace with him and both are caught in a handgrip against each other. It eventually ends when Beowulf rips off one of Grendel's arms. The fight and grip they are both caught it represents, well, two people having sex. Then, Beowulf ends the act by ripping Grendel's arm off, or climaxing.
The same thing happens when Beowulf is forced to fight Grendel's mother, and this is a little more believable for a metaphor for sex (a man and a woman). It follows the same pattern as the original fight, but ends when Beowulf decapitates Grendel's mother, once again following the pattern mentioned above.
I don't really know how to feel about applying this chapter to Beowulf, as instead of an epic fight, I now only see sex. I know that probably wasn't the original intention when this was written, but now I can't ignore it. I'm also a little frightened about the future mainly because I can read something now and instead of interpretation it as it is, I can now see it as sex.
So, this post about Beowulf will be a little awkward considering which chapter of How to Read Literature Like a Professor I'm applying it to. The chapter is called "Everything is Sex" which basically tells us that almost everything in a novel is a metaphor for sex. Going off topic a little bit, I would like to personally tell Ms. Pyle that I could have gone my whole life not knowing that a little boy riding a rocking horse is a metaphor for masturbation and I would have been okay with that. Sadly, I read this chapter and learned this information. It will now stay with me forever so thanks Ms. Pyle.
Anyway, back to the main focus of the post, I recently read about Beowulf's triumphant victory of the monster Grendel and then Grendel's mother. It was after reading about these that I realized that the battles between Beowulf and the monsters were also a metaphor for sex. When he fights against Grendel, he is locked in an embrace with him and both are caught in a handgrip against each other. It eventually ends when Beowulf rips off one of Grendel's arms. The fight and grip they are both caught it represents, well, two people having sex. Then, Beowulf ends the act by ripping Grendel's arm off, or climaxing.
The same thing happens when Beowulf is forced to fight Grendel's mother, and this is a little more believable for a metaphor for sex (a man and a woman). It follows the same pattern as the original fight, but ends when Beowulf decapitates Grendel's mother, once again following the pattern mentioned above.
I don't really know how to feel about applying this chapter to Beowulf, as instead of an epic fight, I now only see sex. I know that probably wasn't the original intention when this was written, but now I can't ignore it. I'm also a little frightened about the future mainly because I can read something now and instead of interpretation it as it is, I can now see it as sex.
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
The Seasons in Novels Matter (#3)
So for my AP Lit Summer Assignment, I have decided to go with the epic poem that is Beowulf. My sister had told me that it was one of her favorite books from AP Lit and I decided to give it a try. It's a little dense at times (as it was written 1000 years ago) but overall, it's a pretty interesting story about a man who fights dangerous monsters.
One part that got me in particular was during a celebration after Beowulf had fought the monster Grendel and won. A minstrel then comes forward and recalls the saga of Finn, a story about a battle between Danish and the Frisians. This story really serves no point to the overall narrative and is really only in their to continue in the theme of vengeance for honor. However, while I was reading, I noticed something that peaked my interest.
After the Danes lose their leader in a battle, they agree to live with the Frisians under the same rule. They then spend a harsh winter there and once spring comes, the feud is back with the Danes being victorious this time. What interested me was the use of the seasons in this saga. I then connected it to the chapter in How to Read Literature about the different meanings of the seasons. The winter basically represents the "death" of the feud between the two warring tribes, as everything on Earth dies with winter. But with the arrival of spring, the feud is "reborn" and they fight again. This was an interesting use of the seasons, showing how the idea of winter and spring can be used as metaphors for death and rebirth and not just for living creatures, but rather for anything. Even though this story doesn't really affect the main plot of Beowulf at all, it was still very interesting to find that symbolism in the saga. In fact, the saga altogether was apparently one of the most respected ever, as it ties into Anglo-Saxon poetry. Overall, I'm really looking forward to the rest of this poem and if anybody wants to, they should definitely read it.
One part that got me in particular was during a celebration after Beowulf had fought the monster Grendel and won. A minstrel then comes forward and recalls the saga of Finn, a story about a battle between Danish and the Frisians. This story really serves no point to the overall narrative and is really only in their to continue in the theme of vengeance for honor. However, while I was reading, I noticed something that peaked my interest.
After the Danes lose their leader in a battle, they agree to live with the Frisians under the same rule. They then spend a harsh winter there and once spring comes, the feud is back with the Danes being victorious this time. What interested me was the use of the seasons in this saga. I then connected it to the chapter in How to Read Literature about the different meanings of the seasons. The winter basically represents the "death" of the feud between the two warring tribes, as everything on Earth dies with winter. But with the arrival of spring, the feud is "reborn" and they fight again. This was an interesting use of the seasons, showing how the idea of winter and spring can be used as metaphors for death and rebirth and not just for living creatures, but rather for anything. Even though this story doesn't really affect the main plot of Beowulf at all, it was still very interesting to find that symbolism in the saga. In fact, the saga altogether was apparently one of the most respected ever, as it ties into Anglo-Saxon poetry. Overall, I'm really looking forward to the rest of this poem and if anybody wants to, they should definitely read it.
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
My Favorite Things (Post #1)
This list took me a while to figure out, but here is a list of my favorite books.
From this list and from what I've said previously, I'm the type of person who enjoys a book with an amazing story. While its true that an outstanding plot isn't the only reason to like a book, I personally only look forward to that in a book. Yes, amazing characters and hidden symbolism do make books great, but overall I look for an interesting and intriguing story. This year during AP Lit, I really hope that we read some books that have an amazing story and me reading and wanting more.
- The Da Vinci Code
- The Devil in the White City
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
- Catching Fire
- What is the What
- The Other Side of the River
- Into the Wild
- Angels and Demons
- In Cold Blood
- The Last Olympian
From this list and from what I've said previously, I'm the type of person who enjoys a book with an amazing story. While its true that an outstanding plot isn't the only reason to like a book, I personally only look forward to that in a book. Yes, amazing characters and hidden symbolism do make books great, but overall I look for an interesting and intriguing story. This year during AP Lit, I really hope that we read some books that have an amazing story and me reading and wanting more.
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Helping the Next Generation (TA)
For the students who are planning on taking AP Lang next year, I have a few tips for you. First off, pay attention to the grammar and rhetorical devices that you learn in class. You will be tested on these and if you don't take good notes, then it will hurt you. Second, keep in mind that this class will be hard if you're someone who enjoys plots or symbolism in books. This class will only be focusing on the language and writing style and how the author formulates their argument. That was how I went into the class and it messed me up a little. Also, when you are reading The Awakening, use the spark notes/cliff notes version of the book or else you might end up like me and a lot of the other students, confused and frustrated. You should also go into this class with a goal of actually doing the assignments on time. Don't wait until the class period before or you will end up regretting it. Finally, all I really have to say is to try your best and enjoy yourself. This class is hard at times, but it is very fun and it will be a great experience for you.
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Prep for Exam (TA)
So, with exams starting next week Black River Students engage in the usual behavior of getting nervous and starting to study (or in the case of Ian McKnight, freaking out, groaning and believing that he did so bad, he will end up selling rotten fruit on the side of a freeway). Two of my toughest exams this year are both my AP classes, AP Lang and AP Euro. Whenever exams come along, I usually do the same thing and it almost always helps me. When reviewing for an exam, I usually just go through all the material that and see what I know and what I need to review. I then go and review the stuff I didn't know until I feel confident that I can do the exam. I also make sure that I don't procrastinate and get distracted by other stuff.
For people who are freaking out over exams (Ian, I'm talking to you) just take a deep breath and calm down. Honestly, freaking out over the exam is worse than the actual exam. I remember a scene in Breaking Bad where Walt says he used to wake up at 3 in the morning and worry about a ton of things happening, but now that he has cancer, he sleeps soundly. Its not so much the actual things that freak people out, its the anticipation that gets people. The best thing to do is calm down and just get the exam done and out of the way.
For people who are freaking out over exams (Ian, I'm talking to you) just take a deep breath and calm down. Honestly, freaking out over the exam is worse than the actual exam. I remember a scene in Breaking Bad where Walt says he used to wake up at 3 in the morning and worry about a ton of things happening, but now that he has cancer, he sleeps soundly. Its not so much the actual things that freak people out, its the anticipation that gets people. The best thing to do is calm down and just get the exam done and out of the way.
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
The Great Naughty Dog (CM)
Many of you play some type of video game, whether it be console, PC, or just on an App on your phone. And as there are many games, there are many game developers too. While each developer has their great games and are very popular, there is only one developer that constantly creates the best games; Naughty Dog.
This game developer has been my favorite ever since I was 8 and got my first console. Naughty Dog started out as a small company and has slowly grown into one of the most popular developers ever. Naughty Dog has also been known for being completely loyal to Sony and only release games for the PlayStation. Their first big hit was the Crash Bandicoot series, a simple game that slowly grew in popularity. They then dominated the PS2 with the Jak and Daxter series, with critics praising it for its fun story, gameplay, and artwork. With the PS3, they moved towards one of their greatest franchises ever, the Uncharted Series with the great Nathan Drake. These games were amazing with awesome sound, visuals, and gameplay and story. Naughty Dog constantly brings game after game of amazing sound, plot, and graphics. Their dedication to the PlayStation is remarkable and their games are always amazing. While there may be other game developers with amazing games, nothing will ever be able to top the genius that is Naughty Dog.
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Bruce Wayne and Chris McCandless (CC)
When I first read the beginning summary for Into the Wild I thought it was going to be an interesting read. Turns out I was right. Its really cool to see how Chris was able to survive in the wilderness on his own in the conditions he faced. When I read the part of how he abandoned his possessions when his car broke down, I made a really weird connection to the movie Batman Begins. For those of you who haven't seen it, Batman Begins is an origin story for Batman and is the first in The Dark Knight trilogy. Near the beginning of the movie, after Bruce meets with this crime boss over the death of his parent's murderer (bit of a long story, won't get into it) he decides to run away from Gotham and spend some time in the underside of society, learning about the criminal mind. Right before he leaves, he gives his coat to some homeless bum on the street.
He decides to get rid of all of his possessions, including his coat, before going into the criminal world, similar to what Chris/Alex did. Alex wanted to fully immerse himself in nature and to actually live off of the land, leaving all of his stuff so he could have the full experience. Bruce did the same thing in order to understand the underside of society and live like a homeless person. Both of these guys decided to fully immerse themselves in this kind of life and it was interesting how I was able to pull Batman out of Into the Wild.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Categorizing by Looks (CC)
The other day, I saw a scene from this funny movie called 21 Jump Street, which was a remake of the original TV show. The movie stars Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum as new cops who go undercover to bust a drug ring. However, the scene that got me to write this blog post was when they were first being introduced to the captain of Jump Street. He addresses the idea of a black captain stereotype and then tells everyone that they should embrace their stereotype about being young, which made me think of What is the What.
When he was trying to get into college, they said that he was old and from his appearance, people would think of him as a sexual predator. Its this type of categorizing and stereotypes that has caused Valentino to be "shunned" in society. Rather than be allowed opportunities in America, Valentino is automatically stereotyped as someone who would only cause trouble, causing him to face problems in America. Its also possibly the reason he was turned away at the hospital and why the police did nothing after he was robbed. From this stereotype he faces hardships that make him question whether leaving Sudan was the right choice.
Its unfair stereotypes like this that affect not only Valentino, but also a lot of people here in the United States. Its amazing how I was able to get unfairness in America for people (ie Blacks, Hispanics, etc.) just from 21 Jump Street.
When he was trying to get into college, they said that he was old and from his appearance, people would think of him as a sexual predator. Its this type of categorizing and stereotypes that has caused Valentino to be "shunned" in society. Rather than be allowed opportunities in America, Valentino is automatically stereotyped as someone who would only cause trouble, causing him to face problems in America. Its also possibly the reason he was turned away at the hospital and why the police did nothing after he was robbed. From this stereotype he faces hardships that make him question whether leaving Sudan was the right choice.
Its unfair stereotypes like this that affect not only Valentino, but also a lot of people here in the United States. Its amazing how I was able to get unfairness in America for people (ie Blacks, Hispanics, etc.) just from 21 Jump Street.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Inside the Characters of Breaking Bad (RD)
(Warning: Breaking Bad Spoilers Below. Also, I would like to note I did not steal this idea from Jack, I had been thinking of doing a Breaking Bad post for a while and apparently he also wanted to do one).
Breaking Bad was definitely one of the greatest television shows ever and it is due to the amazing writing and acting. While Walter White is the main character and definitely the one whose character we have all come to know and fear, I chose to instead focus on two other characters; Jesse and Todd.
Breaking Bad was definitely one of the greatest television shows ever and it is due to the amazing writing and acting. While Walter White is the main character and definitely the one whose character we have all come to know and fear, I chose to instead focus on two other characters; Jesse and Todd.
First, I'll start with Jesse. We all know Jesse as being Walt's partner and as a irresponsible kid who could have been good, but went to drugs. Jesse was definitely the heart of the show, as he was able to bring out the emotions from the audience. His ethos was close to perfect, as everyone could believe his story; a kid who had potential in life, but decided to go to drugs. As for logos, although he seemed stupid at times, he showed some knowledge in chemistry mainly due to his knowledge on meth. He also was the one who said what everyone was thinking (i.e. kill Tuco, wrong of Todd to kill the kid). Finally, his character was able to elicit more emotion than any other character on the show. Everyone sympathized with Jesse and felt bad for him whenever he was treated like trash or dealt with difficult situations. Overall, he was, by far, one of the best characters on the show.
The other character I decided to analyze was Todd, the guy that helped them rob the train and whose Uncle helped kill the 9 people in jail and also Hank and Steve. While many people see Todd as trash and hate him, I want to take this time to defend him. His ethos showed him as a naïve kid; someone who didn't know anything and thought, for example, that killing the kid would help them. Also, considering who his uncle is, I'm not surprised he turned out the way he did. It was either listen to Jack or be killed, not great choices. He also elicited sympathy not only from his uncles cruelty, but also when he fell in love with Lydia and tried to hook up with her. As for logos, like I said he was a stupid kid, but when he did have good ideas, they would usually be good ones, like keeping Jesse alive. While I can't say that killing Andrea or imprisoning Jesse was good, I do believe that Todd was a likeable character and I was sad when Jesse killed him.
Overall, Breaking Bad had a unique set of characters and they were what made the show what it was. While I'm sad that it's over, I'm happy that it was able to entertain us for 5 seasons and provide us with amazing television.
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
The Worst Winter (CM)
As we all know, this winter has been very cold and harsh. Many people say that it hasn't been this bad since 1978 where it was just awful. However, I hate this winter and I really want it to end. The cold, the massive amounts of snow, everything has just been terrible.
Now, I realize that some of you may like winter and may have some objections to make against me, so it is my job to silence them. Some of you may say that the huge amounts of snow are fun to play in. Yes, giant mounds of snow are fun, but its not fun to go outside when it is 3 degrees with a wind-chill of -12. It has been freezing cold the past couple of days and it is not fun. You can't enjoy the snow because its so cold.
People may also say that this winter has been great because of the snow days. While the first two we got at the beginning of the year were okay, these past four haven't been the best. The main reason is that I couldn't sleep in on those days. On Thursday and Friday, I had to clear the driveway so that my mom could go to work and on Monday, she got stuck getting out of the driveway, so I had to get up early again and help her out and then clear the driveway. Not fun.
This finally leads me to the downside of this huge amount of snow; driving. To start, its very hard to drive with snow and ice on the ground if you don't have a four wheel drive. There's also the stupid plows who, once they go by, leave a huge mound of snow at the foot of the driveway. Because of this, I had to help my mom get out of it early in the morning and then again when my dad's car got stuck.
In conclusion, I hate this winter and after reading this post, all of you should as well. I wish spring would come sooner or all the snow would melt or something. The only upside to this is that we're experiencing the true seasons of Michigan; winter, still winter, almost winter, and construction.
Now, I realize that some of you may like winter and may have some objections to make against me, so it is my job to silence them. Some of you may say that the huge amounts of snow are fun to play in. Yes, giant mounds of snow are fun, but its not fun to go outside when it is 3 degrees with a wind-chill of -12. It has been freezing cold the past couple of days and it is not fun. You can't enjoy the snow because its so cold.
People may also say that this winter has been great because of the snow days. While the first two we got at the beginning of the year were okay, these past four haven't been the best. The main reason is that I couldn't sleep in on those days. On Thursday and Friday, I had to clear the driveway so that my mom could go to work and on Monday, she got stuck getting out of the driveway, so I had to get up early again and help her out and then clear the driveway. Not fun.
This finally leads me to the downside of this huge amount of snow; driving. To start, its very hard to drive with snow and ice on the ground if you don't have a four wheel drive. There's also the stupid plows who, once they go by, leave a huge mound of snow at the foot of the driveway. Because of this, I had to help my mom get out of it early in the morning and then again when my dad's car got stuck.
In conclusion, I hate this winter and after reading this post, all of you should as well. I wish spring would come sooner or all the snow would melt or something. The only upside to this is that we're experiencing the true seasons of Michigan; winter, still winter, almost winter, and construction.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Trouble in Sudan (IR)
Recently in class, we participated in a Model UN activity where we represented parties similar to those of Sudan and Southern Sudan to help integrate us into What Is The What. I then decided to look more into the issues facing Sudan and I found this article in the New York Times.
High Stakes for Sudan in the South's Conflict
It basically describes the current situation in Sudan that we recently learned; how South Sudan is beginning to fight against Sudan for the oil reserves. It also goes onto talk about how their first priority is to go the negotiations table and try to figure out a peaceful solution. Reading this made me feel good about my negotiations group and how we were the only ones in our whole class who didn't want war (Minus Keegan and Jonathon).
It's a little sad that I didn't learn about what was happening in Sudan until a couple of days ago. It's bizarre how little stories about the current situation in Sudan have made the news. I guess that since the US isn't involved in the situation yet, no one is super interested which is just wrong. Just because there is no US involvement doesn't mean that it should be ignored.
Anyway, the current situation almost exactly mirrors What Is The What with the South in disarray and people, like young boys, fleeing from their homes to find safety. Many have fled to Uganda to escape the horrors which is why Uganda is involved in this situation. As shown below, refugees are struggling and have no choice but to head for Uganda.
I'm not sure what the outcome of these uprisings will be. But its scary to think that while reading about a previous civil war in Sudan, another may happen in the future.
High Stakes for Sudan in the South's Conflict
It basically describes the current situation in Sudan that we recently learned; how South Sudan is beginning to fight against Sudan for the oil reserves. It also goes onto talk about how their first priority is to go the negotiations table and try to figure out a peaceful solution. Reading this made me feel good about my negotiations group and how we were the only ones in our whole class who didn't want war (Minus Keegan and Jonathon).
It's a little sad that I didn't learn about what was happening in Sudan until a couple of days ago. It's bizarre how little stories about the current situation in Sudan have made the news. I guess that since the US isn't involved in the situation yet, no one is super interested which is just wrong. Just because there is no US involvement doesn't mean that it should be ignored.
Anyway, the current situation almost exactly mirrors What Is The What with the South in disarray and people, like young boys, fleeing from their homes to find safety. Many have fled to Uganda to escape the horrors which is why Uganda is involved in this situation. As shown below, refugees are struggling and have no choice but to head for Uganda.
I'm not sure what the outcome of these uprisings will be. But its scary to think that while reading about a previous civil war in Sudan, another may happen in the future.
Monday, January 13, 2014
Who Will Win the Game of Thrones? (FW)
In the lands of Westeros is where the battle lies and powerful houses are all fighting for one thing; the Iron Throne and control of the Seven Kingdoms. I'm talking about the epic book series A Song of Ice and Fire and the HBO original series Game of Thrones.
I've only recently gotten into this show, but it has slowly become an obsession of mine. The amazing story by George R.R. Martin coupled with the great actors makes for an outstanding show. Also the fact that its on HBO doesn't hurt at all.
For those who don't know, Game of Thrones takes place in a land called Westeros where the Winters last for what seems like forever. The land is ruled at Kingslanding in a position known as the Iron Throne. However, after the Iron Throne, there are many other families who rule certain parts of the Kingdom. Westeros is cut off near the North by this gigantic Ice Mound known as The Wall where Westeros and the uncharted lands are split off.
The show (and books) don't really focus on one perspective. Instead, it moves around to other characters, showing their point of view and giving the audience a chance to see how everyone lives. The main focus of the story is on the Starks; a family who lives North and controls the kingdom of Winterfell. However, it also shows other people, such as Jon Snow, a bastard child of Ned Stark and Daenerys Targaryen, an exiled princess who lives on another continent and years to return home.
Honestly, there's some much to talk about Game of Thrones that I won't get too involved in it. I'll just give my own opinion; this show is a masterpiece. The music, acting, visuals, everything comes to perfection. I also personally am for the Starks taking control of the Kingdoms, but I also do enjoy watching Daenerys, Jon, and Tyrion Lannister (who is by far my favorite character). I've only watched the first season, so if people have seen seasons 2 or 3 or have read all of the books. I would appreciate it if you didn't spoil it for me. Finally, to the people who haven't watched it for some reason, watch it. Honestly, it only took one thing to get me hooked on the show, the title sequence.
I've only recently gotten into this show, but it has slowly become an obsession of mine. The amazing story by George R.R. Martin coupled with the great actors makes for an outstanding show. Also the fact that its on HBO doesn't hurt at all.
For those who don't know, Game of Thrones takes place in a land called Westeros where the Winters last for what seems like forever. The land is ruled at Kingslanding in a position known as the Iron Throne. However, after the Iron Throne, there are many other families who rule certain parts of the Kingdom. Westeros is cut off near the North by this gigantic Ice Mound known as The Wall where Westeros and the uncharted lands are split off.
The show (and books) don't really focus on one perspective. Instead, it moves around to other characters, showing their point of view and giving the audience a chance to see how everyone lives. The main focus of the story is on the Starks; a family who lives North and controls the kingdom of Winterfell. However, it also shows other people, such as Jon Snow, a bastard child of Ned Stark and Daenerys Targaryen, an exiled princess who lives on another continent and years to return home.
Honestly, there's some much to talk about Game of Thrones that I won't get too involved in it. I'll just give my own opinion; this show is a masterpiece. The music, acting, visuals, everything comes to perfection. I also personally am for the Starks taking control of the Kingdoms, but I also do enjoy watching Daenerys, Jon, and Tyrion Lannister (who is by far my favorite character). I've only watched the first season, so if people have seen seasons 2 or 3 or have read all of the books. I would appreciate it if you didn't spoil it for me. Finally, to the people who haven't watched it for some reason, watch it. Honestly, it only took one thing to get me hooked on the show, the title sequence.
The amazing visuals, coupled with some awesome music make for a really great intro. To rap things up, this show is one of my favorite shows and I can't wait for Season 4 to come and continue to give the world its greatness.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)